Why Is Wyoming's Early 2008 Presidential Pick Still The Biggest Story You've (Probably) Never Heard Of?
First Rudy leaves New Hampshire for California and now this.
For weeks we've heard murmurs of Wyoming's uppity intention to swoop in and steal New Hampshire's First In The Nation thunder.
Murmurs no longer.
This morning we called the Wyoming Secretary of State to see what we could see about Wyoming's '08 plan to select presidential delegates.
We didn't see much.
Wyoming, unlike NH, allows its Parties to decide when to hold their primary.
So we called the Wyoming Democratic State Headquarters.
The Wyoming Democratic Party told us that Wyoming Democrats would select their presidential delegates on March 8, 2008 come "hell or high water".
Again, not much of a story since the NH Primary will be in January of '08.
But then we called the Wyoming Republican State Headquarters and JACKPOT!
"Yes, the Republicans will select 12 delegates on the same day as the New Hampshire Primary," said the cheerful woman on the other end of the telephone.
She even directed us to a Casper Star Tribune Article from February 6, 2007:
The Wyoming Republican Central Committee voted unanimously Saturday to have the party's presidential delegate selection next year on “the same date as the new Hampshire Republican Primary, whenever that may be.”Feathers will fly? VELCRO?
New Hampshire's presidential primary is scheduled for January 2008.
Tom Sansonetti, a former Wyoming Republican Party chairman who presented the proposal to the committee, said Monday that once the information about Wyoming gets to the New Hampshire secretary of state, “the feathers will fly."
New Hampshire always wants to be first in the national presidential selection game, and the secretary of state is authorized to change the date if needed.
“That's the reason for the wording of the resolution,” Sansonetti said Monday. “We've worded it in such a fashion that we're like Velcro. We're stuck right up against them. So where they go, we go.”
“It will be the first Western primary for the Republican Party,” Sansonetti said.
Has New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner finally met his match?
Wyoming is a small state that has (so far) proved proficient at running elections. However, we wonder if they can keep the Velcro sticking as Mr. Gardner bobs, weaves and stalls over the next 11 months.
IMPORTANT NOTE(!!!): But, if Wyoming stays stuck, how does Wolf Blitzer explain the difference between New Hampshire's 32 delegates and Wyoming's 12 delegates when a candidate needs 1,255 delegates to win the Republican nomination?
In other words, what's the difference between 1% and 3% to a CNN viewer?
Is Wyoming going to be as important as New Hampshire in nominating our next President?